• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Members Login

Oregon Forest Industries Council

  • About
    • Values
    • Members
    • Staff
  • News
    • Press Releases
    • Past Guest Opinions
  • Blog
  • Forest Policy
    • Private Forest Accord
    • Carbon Policy
    • Fire Suppression
      • Wildfire Funding
    • State Forests
    • Preserving Water Quality
    • Engineered Wood Products
    • Forest Taxation
    • Forestry Herbicides
  • Resources
    • Podcast
    • Forest Facts
    • Scholarship
    • Private forestland closures
    • Links
  • Grounded in Science

OFIC

Timber compromise bill triggers negotiations, spray restrictions

July 1, 2020 By OFIC

By Mateusz Perkowski | Capital Press | July 1, 2020

**This story originally appeared in the Capital Press, see that story here. 

Potential changes to Oregon’s forestry laws will be negotiated over the next 18 months now that lawmakers have passed a compromise bill between timber and environmental interests.

However, stricter notification requirements for helicopter spray operations and enhanced no-spray buffers around schools and streams are set to become effective as early as next year, even before additional revisions are hammered out.

Timber companies and environmental groups struck a deal earlier this year to pass the bill rather than try to persuade voters to pass competing ballot initiatives about forestry regulations. The timber industry feared the environmental proposals would have reduced logging on private lands by 25% by acreage.

However, the previous compromise bill died earlier this year when Republican lawmakers walked out of the Legislature rather than vote on controversial climate legislation that was strongly opposed by natural resource industries.

During the special session that concluded on June 26, though, the compromise was revived as Senate Bill 1602 and passed the House and Senate with overwhelming majorities.

Under the legislation, a landowner or timber operator must provide notification of a planned helicopter pesticide operation the day before spraying begins, down from about two weeks under current law.

Interested parties will learn of the spray operations through the Oregon Department of Forestry’s forest activity electronic reporting and notification system, known as FERNS.

Aside from this change, the operator must also initially provide the agency with a shorter 90-day window for when the treatment might occur, down from the current year, and complete additional post-application reporting requirements.

Spray operations in the forest are prone to being called off and rescheduled because they can only occur in narrow wind, temperature and humidity conditions, said Richard Zabel, executive director of the Western Forestry and Conservation Association.

“When you can’t spray, you’re essentially starting all over again,” Zabel said.

Similar notification requirements were opposed during past legislative sessions by the timber industry, which criticized them as being impractical and causing unnecessary anxiety among neighboring landowners.

Previously, technology didn’t exist that could efficiently provide such remote notification, said Greg Miller, representative of the timber companies involved in the compromise.

In 2020, “we found a way to get to yes” in light of technological advancements that “while still untested” are ready to be implemented at the Oregon Department of Forestry “and we hope that the notification reduces safety concerns for all involved,” Miller said in an email.

The new notification requirements would become effective on July 1, 2021 unless the Department of Forestry determines its system lacks the capacity at that point, in which case the agency would have another year to implement it.

New no-spray buffer regulations under SB 1602 will become effective even earlier, on Jan. 1, 2021.

Buffers around certain streams that are currently as narrow as 20 feet will increase to 75 to 100 feet, depending on stream type, while the buffers around schools and homes will increase from 60 to 300 feet under the bill.

While Oregon’s commercial forests don’t have many buildings compared to other land uses, the law also prohibits spraying within 300 feet of points of diversion for drinking water, which will probably be more consequential, said Mike Cloughesy, director of forestry for the Oregon Forest Resources Institute.

“There are a lot more water take-outs than there there are schools,” Cloughesy said.

Though much of SB 1602 imposes conditions on forestry operations, it also contains penalties for interfering with aerial herbicide spraying, with penalties of up to $5,000 for the “use of force, violence or action that impedes a pesticide application by helicopter to forestland.”

Interference doesn’t include “photography, videotaping, audiotaping or other creation of an electronic record” by someone on public property or private property where they’re allowed.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Herbicides, Water

Forestry is a family tradition and commitment

June 28, 2020 By OFIC

Originally posted on Oregon Forests Forever

Remember Father’s Day 2019 when we shared this video celebrating Bruce Alber, a father and retired forester who took a picture every year, for 40 years of the same tree in a coastal managed forest?

Well, we discovered the next generation Bruce Alber! Meet Jake and Ellie Hilger, who were inspired by Bruce to start their own photo project documenting both their lives and the growth of a forest Jake planted. After graduating with a degree in forest management from Oregon State University, Jake has been working as a reforestation forester in Tillamook Oregon.  In his 7-year-career, he estimates that he has overseen the replanting of four million trees.

OFF: Tell us about your photo project.

Ellie: This photo series represents so much. It represents the care and passion that Jake has for forestry. He is careful and thoughtful about each site for which he has responsibility. He knows every site that he has planted, and watches with vigilance to make sure that they grow successfully. When we are out in the woods together, he always points out the sites that he has planted, and describes the successes and challenges of growing each area.

The site is North of Netarts, and is one of the first sites that Jake was in charge of planting. The first photo from 2014 shows the area after it was newly harvested, just 6 months before replanting.
This is in 2015, with new baby trees in the background as well as Jake’s new puppy, named Tate.
In 2016, you can start to see the growth of new trees in the background.
I appear in 2017, our first year of marriage (note the growth of trees in the background.)
2018 – the trees are taller than Tate now.
In 2019: as you can see, this photo series not only documents the growth of a forest, but also the growth of our family. Our daughter Ruth was born at the start of February. We try to take her out with us to get some exercising walking the logging roads as often as we can. She usually falls asleep right away but we are already teaching her our love of the outdoors.

Jake’s plan is to continue taking photos of this forest every year until the trees are ready to be harvested, about 40 years from the year they were planted in 2015. This will be about the time that Jake plans to retire, and will be something that he will look back on with pride.  

OFF: Jake, why did you become a forester?

Jake: My father was a logger and I have happy memories as a child of him taking me to work. My fondest memory is sitting on his lap in the log loader and him letting me use the controls to pick up and swing the heavy logs. I thought it was thrilling to feel the machine shake in response to weight of the timber.

I was only 7 when my father past away. Though we didn’t have much time with him, my three siblings and I were greatly influenced by his hard work ethic and love of the woods. The loggers that he worked with, along with friends and family from our community, gave my family so much support after his passing. The loggers took the time to take me and my siblings out to the logging jobs when we were young and later allowed us to job shadow and gave us jobs in the summer when we were old enough. They established an annual fundraiser that allowed myself and my siblings to attend college. There is no doubt in my mind that my family and I would not have had the success we’ve had in life without the help of the generous men and women that our father worked with in the timber industry and the friends and family from our community.

Working in the timber industry is more than a career – it’s a lifestyle, and those who you work with quickly become a family to you. I’m proud to walk some of the same ground my father worked on, now as a forester. Ellie is pregnant with our first child and I wonder if she will someday harvest and plant trees on the same ground that her father and grandfather have.

OFF: Ellie – what’s it feel like to be part of a family with such ties to forestry?

Ellie: Our family is flourishing. We take pride in representing Jake’s company in events and organizations, such as the June Dairy Parade, Tillamook Working Lands and Waters Cooperative, Tillamook Chamber of Commerce, and the Tillamook County Fair. We feel like a connected and important part of our community. 

OFF: Jake, what does a reforestation forester do?

Jake: My responsibility is to ensure the success of the next generation of forest after harvest. I track each acre harvested for the first 15-20 years of its life. Most of the work I do is focused on the first 5 years. The most challenging yet most rewarding work I do is overseeing the planting of trees. This year I’ll see about 700,000 seedlings planted, all by hand. The forestland I help to manage around Tillamook County is on its 2nd to 3rd rotation. Several generations of foresters and loggers have worked the ground before me and how they cared for it directly affects my ability to successfully reforest it. The next generation is constantly in my mind with the work I do. Forty years from now I want the trees I grow to become a vibrant forest producing wood, creating jobs as well as providing habitat for wildlife, clean water, and recreation opportunities.

OFF: What do you want people to know about your job?

Jake: I wish more people understood that in order to meet society’s demand for wood we have to actively manage forests. Less than 0.5 percent of Americans work in forestry and we produce wood products while maintaining the environmental and social benefits forest create. Foresters and loggers are Oregonians who love to be outside and enjoy our natural resources. I hunt, fish, pick berries and mushrooms, cut fire wood, recreate, and am employed on the private timberland I help manage. Protecting the environment is very important – it allows me all these activities that are central to mine and my family’s lives.

For example, my brother works for the same logging company our father did. Several years ago Oregon had a very wet winter and there are rules about sedimentation that restrict hauling logs during wet weather. When rainfall reaches a certain amount in 24 hours or the road conditions get too soft my brother has to stop working. As a result during those winter months he averaged only four days of work a week. For someone on a tight budget, missed days of work are tough, but I never heard him complain about the rules causing him to miss work. As foresters and loggers the environment is important to us and we believe in protecting it for the next generations and we believe in the rules we follow.

Filed Under: Blog, Voices

Oregon forest deal still alive, timber companies, environmentalists say

April 2, 2020 By OFIC

By Pete Danko | Portland Business Journal | Apr 2, 2020

** This story originally appeared in the Portland Business Journal. See that story here.

The big agreement between environmental groups and the forest industry that was waylaid by the Republican legislative walkout — remember that? — is still on.

Gov. Kate Brown put out the word in a news release Tuesday, wedged into a steady stream of announcements related to the COVID-19 response.

The parties had agreed in February on a process to develop forest-practice regulations that industry can live with while meeting federal standards to protect threatened and endangered species, including salmon.

As part of the memorandum of understanding, each side said it would drop competing initiative petitions once the 2020 Legislature passed a bill to create an aerial pesticide spraying notification system and buffer zones around homes, schools and water sources.

But Republicans blew up the Legislature with their opposition to a cap and trade bill, and the pesticide bill didn’t pass.

There was talk that it could be quickly included in a special session, but the pandemic soon became all-consuming.

Nonetheless, the signatories reaffirmed to Brown they will still move to withdraw the initiatives, which might have faced a signature-gathering challenge anyway, given restrictions on public activities. In a March 25 letter released by the governor’s office Tuesday, they wrote:

The MOU envisions coordinated actions by signatories, the Governor’s office, the Board of Forestry, and – importantly – the Legislature. We remain very committed to meeting the terms of the MOU, including legislation, at the nearest possible time that circumstances related to the coronavirus pandemic allow.

Given our mutual commitment to the key elements of the MOU, and also recognizing the priorities of Oregon at this time, we will make efforts to assist the respective petitioners with the formal withdrawal of the competing ballot measures.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Water

Governor Kate Brown Announces Continued Agreement on Science-Based Forest Management

March 31, 2020 By OFIC

By Governor Kate Brow’s Office | March 31, 2020

**This press release originally appeared on the Governor’s website. See that release here.

Timber and environmental groups reinforce their commitment to February pact brokered by Governor Brown

Salem, OR—Governor Kate Brown today issued the following statement on receiving a reaffirmation of commitment from forest industry and environmental groups to work together on a science-informed policy development process related to forest practice laws and regulations.

In February, the signatories to the original memorandum of understanding agreed to drive a process to update the state’s timber practices balancing habitat and working in the woods, with the mutual goals of meeting the standards of endorsement from federal wildlife agencies; passing legislation on aerial spraying of pesticides to enhance spray buffer zones and notification practices; expanding stream buffers for salmon, steelhead, and bull trout streams; and sustaining Oregon’s critical forest products industries. Both sides agreed to drop all forestry-related initiative petitions and related litigation after passage of updated legislation addressing the areas of contention.

“Two short months ago, with the goal of creating a better future for Oregon, the state’s forest industry and major environmental groups were able to find common ground in a historic collaboration,” said Governor Brown. “Since then, all of our daily lives have changed dramatically, as our state has been dealing with the spread of COVID-19. Right now, my top priority is the safety and health of Oregonians. I am doing everything in my power to slow the spread of the virus and protect our front-line workers to keep people safe.

“Now we’re going to need to work together more than ever. I am pleased to have the partnership of industry and advocates to achieve the original goals of the memorandum of understanding, including legislation, as soon as circumstances allow for this very important work to resume.

“I, too, remain committed to our collective goals and to the long-term health of our state. Oregonians want healthy forests and fish, a vibrant forest sector, and prosperous rural communities, and I appreciate the continued collaboration to make this happen.”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Herbicides, Water

‘Foresters are the original environmentalists’ says Whitney Henneman

March 29, 2020 By OFIC

Originally posted on Oregon Forests Forever.

Oregon’s forests are filled with hardworking people who love taking care of one of Oregon’s best resources: our thriving trees. Over the next few months we’ll be sharing their voices with you for a glimpse of what it’s like working in and for the forests.

This week we’re sharing Whitney Henneman’s story, a forester with Silver Butte Timber Company:

I am pleased to have the opportunity to share my story about timber and why I’m proud of my industry.

I am a third generation forester. I am an Oregon transplant, and a Roseburg local. I’m married to a forester. And I have pitch in my veins.

Forestry is more than loggers, truck drivers, and foresters. My industry is made up of forest engineers, geneticists, nurserymen; blue collar and white collar jobs all united for the common goal: forests forever. I work for a 6th generation family-owned company that has a sawmill and 45,000 acres of timberland spread throughout Coos, Douglas, and Jackson Counties.

I am in charge of the reforestation program at my company and spend years collecting the best seed to deploy, months writing the perfect prescription, and endless days seeing the fruits of my labor unfold. I have been in the business long enough to have seen my plantations grow, the wildlife thrive, and clean water flow through the well managed forests that I get to work and play in.

Foresters are the original environmentalists; we get up at 3 AM to drive to the tree cooler or the landing, we sweat through our rain gear and have perpetual poison oak. The days are long and often hard, but the inspiration is unbound. I see first hand the healthy forests I contribute to, I see the renewable resource we create, I see the jobs we maintain, I see the ecosystem thrive, and I see the future forests I grow that will benefit my grandchildren. You see, forests have my vision. My grandfather planted trees that my generation gets to utilize, that’s full circle!

“Foresters are the original environmentalists”

I am so proud of my industry. I’m so proud of the resilient people who are passionate about renewable resources that pour their soul into forests for us to enjoy and utilize. I am so proud of the work I do everyday to ensure forests forever. I am so proud of the mills that are evolving and creating wood products that store carbon for centuries; of the science based decisions we make on the ground, and the impact we get to make for the benefits of entire ecosystems. I get to enjoy opportunities to hunt and fish on our managed forest, I get to take my family to the creeks in our managed forests to play, and I get to steward Oregon’s greatest resource.

Thank you for bringing my voice and the work forest managers do, and the voices of many others, into the public view. It is a needed and important part of what makes this state truly Oregon.

– Whitney Henneman

Filed Under: Voices

Environmentalists And Timber Industry Reach Agreement On Forests, Avoiding Oregon Ballot Fights

February 10, 2020 By OFIC

By Dirk VanderHart and Tony Schick | OPB | Feb 10, 2020

** This story originally appeared on OPB.

What has looked for months like an epic looming battle over Oregon’s forests has been called off under a new deal reached by environmental groups and logging industry players.

In an agreement announced Monday, conservation-minded groups have agreed to abandon a series of ballot measures aimed at stepped-up protections for forest waters, and at limiting aerial spraying of pesticides, among other things.

At the same time, timber industry players are planning to ditch their own ballot measures – filed in response to the environmental proposals – that would require landowners be compensated when state regulations curbed their ability to log, and alter the makeup of a state board that controls forest management policies.

The deal could result in the most significant changes to Oregon’s forest practices since the adoption of the Northwest Forest Plan in the 1990s.

“Healthy forests and a vibrant forestry industry are not mutually exclusive, and Oregonians need both for prosperous and sustainable communities,” Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said.

“The Cooperating Parties acknowledge that they have an incentive to reach a compromise on historically difficult issues without risking adverse outcomes in an election,” reads a memorandum of understanding signed by 26 groups – 13 on either side of the issue. The list includes environmental activists such as Oregon Wild, the Audubon Society of Portland, and the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, along with large timber outfits such as Stimson Lumber, Roseburg Forest Products and Weyerhaeuser.

Speaking on behalf of the forest industry coalition, Greg Miller, a former Weyerhaeuser spokesman, said the agreement would increase environmental benefits and provide certainty for the business community.

“This is the time, this is the historic moment where we can drive benefit for all Oregonians,” Miller said.

Another company signing the deal, Roseburg Forest Products, stood by its current practices and said the agreement was about setting aside differences.

“While we are confident in our current science-based forest practices, we recognize the need for a direct conversation about forest management,” spokeswoman Rebecca Taylor said. “The cooperative agreement announced today charts a path to provide greater assurances for a strong and vibrant industry and a healthy environment.”

Bob Van Dyk of the Wild Salmon Center, speaking on behalf of the environmental coalition, said the new agreement could bring Oregon up to date with environmental protections already adopted by its neighbors. Habitat conservation plans are already in place throughout forests, with the same ecology and many of the same landowners, throughout Washington state.

Oregon Wild Executive Director Sean Stevens, also a signer of the agreement, said that depends on the progress made over the next two years.

“This agreement is only a first step in a longer journey,” Stevens said. “Conservation of Oregon’s forests, and communities that live around them and rely upon them, is not guaranteed at the end of this process.”THANKS TO OUR SPONSOR:Become a Sponsor

Rather than engaging in an expensive and uncertain war to win over voters, both sides have agreed to participate in a mediated process of up to 18 months, according to the memo. The goal: to arrive at a federally approved “habitat conservation plan” for how private forests should be managed with an eye toward ensuring protection of vulnerable species and water resources.

In the meantime, timber industry players have agreed to support a bill in this year’s legislative session that would increase notification requirements for aerial pesticide spraying on private timber land, and increase buffers for such spraying around schools, homes and streams.

Aerial spraying has been a controversial practice for decades. It is a linchpin of industrial-scale forestry, as many timber owners consider spraying in the early years after a clear cut the most effective way to kill unwanted plants and regenerate a new crop of Douglas fir seedlings. It is also the subject of complaints from neighbors and environmental groups about potential drift or runoff into water. Multiple communities in Oregon’s coast range have claimed they were sickened by wayward pesticides meant to kill unwanted plants on private tree plantations.

The timber industry successfully fought additional no-spray buffers and requirements for notifying neighbors of aerial spraying during previous legislative sessions, but the industry also had indications those issues would be more vulnerable on the ballot than in the hands of lawmakers.

Voters in Lincoln County approved a ban on aerial spraying in 2016, which was later overturned in court. That was despite industry groups and other opponents of the ban outspending supporters $475,000 to $21,600.

Beyond that, the industry’s own polling also has shown that voters in coastal counties have widespread support for logging but are nonetheless “very susceptible to the idea of banning aerial pesticides,” according to a memo obtained by OPB and The Oregonian/Oregonlive through Oregon’s public records law.

The 2018 memo from the Oregon Forest & Industries Council, which represents large timber companies and many of the signatories to today’s agreement, outlined poll results from 500 likely voters in coastal Oregon.

The polling showed that, when given context about why companies use pesticides, between 55-57% of likely voters polled thought aerial spraying was “unnecessary” or “bad” and risked the spread of harmful chemicals through air and water. About a third of those polled considered the practice “necessary” or “good” for growing mature forests and supporting an important industry.

“Underlining the difficulty of this conversation,” the memo states, “voters who have immediate family employed in the timber industry or are employed themselves oppose aerial pesticides at the same rate as voters overall.”

The newly-announced deal also includes restrictions on stream-side logging in southern Oregon’s Siskiyou region, rules meant to protect fish. The region was exempted from those logging buffers, which are in place throughout the rest of the state’s coastal forests.

The mutual disarmament avoids what looked like a potentially bruising ballot fight later this year. And according to some players in the agreement, it creates a path by which Oregon could push forward protective policies long sought by environmental groups, while offering more certainty to property owners about how they can manage their land.

The agreement, brokered by the governor’s office, came together in four meetings held over the course of just two weeks, according to one participant.

While the deal calls for both sides to largely drop ballot proposals, it explicitly allows a legal fight over three of those proposals to continue.

The initiative petitions, filed with backing from the group Oregon Wild, all sought to step up protections against spraying and logging near forest waters and other sensitive areas. But all three were rejected by Secretary of State Bev Clarno, who found they were unconstitutionally overbroad.

Petitioners have challenged that opinion, and the case is currently before the Oregon Court of Appeals. The memorandum indicates the group intends to see the case “to final resolution.”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Herbicides, Water

Timber companies, environmentalists sign ‘historic’ pact on Oregon forest management

February 10, 2020 By OFIC

By Associated Press | Feb 10, 2020

**This story originally appeared on KVAL.

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — Environmental groups and timber companies in Oregon, which have clashed for decades, on Monday unveiled a road map for overhauling forest practice regulations, a step that Gov. Kate Brown called “historic.”

The agreement came after the two sides quietly held meetings, facilitated by the governor’s office, in Salem and Portland over the last month to try to find common ground, instead of filing competing initiative petitions and lawsuits.

“I walked in on the first meeting, and I knew folks were serious when the timber industry folks had their shirt sleeves rolled up and enviros were in suits and ties,” Brown said at a news conference.Gov. Brown announces ‘historic’ agreement on Oregon forest management

The meetings resulted in leaders of around a dozen environmental groups, including Oregon Wild, the Audubon Society of Portland and Cascadia Wildlands, and of a dozen timber companies, including Weyerhaeuser, one of the largest forest products companies in the world, and Lone Rock of Roseburg, Oregon, signing a memorandum of understanding.

Oregon Strategy MOU (Final Executed) by Sinclair Broadcast Group – Eugene on Scribd

Oregon leads the nation in wood-products manufacturing, according to industry experts, even though environmental groups and the timber industry have been backing rival initiative petitions that seek to put measures on the ballot. They have also backed rival legislation and filed lawsuits.

Under the new agreement, both sides would complete a stand-down from pursuing changes through the initiative process, related legal actions, and legislative and regulatory proceedings.

The agreement represents a departure from 20 years of tension, said Bob Van Dyk, Oregon and California policy director for the Wild Salmon Center. He appeared with Brown at the news conference.Bob Van Dyk from environmental coalition

That animosity “results in a lack of trust, gridlock on forest policy and a growing public demand for broader reform,” Van Dyk said. “Today we’re starting a new approach … It’s a path of collaboration toward stronger conservation measures and more certainty for the timber industry.”

Greg Miller, a long-time timber industry executive and representative of the coalition of forest companies, told reporters he hopes the memorandum of understanding “sets Oregon up for the most comprehensive, forward-thinking forest policy in the nation.”

Both sides underscored that while it is a big moment, it is only a first step.

“Conservation of Oregon’s forests, and communities that live around them and rely upon them, is not guaranteed at the end of this process. It will require significant work over the next two years to modernize forest rules,” said Sean Stevens, executive director of Oregon Wild.

Under the agreement, both sides would support immediate legislation to establish helicopter pesticide application buffers, or no-direct application zones, around inhabited dwellings and schools and around streams.

Nik Blosser, Brown’s chief of staff, described in a telephone interview how the two sides came together. The seed was planted when a group of timber company CEOs met with Brown in January and asked her if she could broker a deal on all the litigation and initiative petitions.

Blosser then contacted the environmentalists, thinking that this was a long-shot effort.

“I called them and said, ‘Are you interested in sitting down and having this conversation?’ And they said, ‘Well, we’re not sure how serious they really are. And I said, ‘Well, I think they’re pretty serious, so why don’t we do one meeting and give it a try?,” Blosser recalled.

There wound up being four meetings, with five people representing each side, Blosser said. Everyone was fully engaged.

“Nobody looked at their phones, which is kind of remarkable in a meeting nowadays. Everyone was listening and everyone was acknowledging the other person talking and that what they said was sincere,” Blosser said.

The memorandum they agreed to sets up a process for overhauling the Oregon Forest Practices Act — a set of laws enacted in 1971 that made Oregon the first state to implement a comprehensive set of laws governing forest practices. It contains provisions for activities such as how timber harvests happen on private forest lands, providing riparian buffers along rivers and streams and the replanting of trees.

Both sides agreed the plan needs to be science-based, though debate is expected on what the science says, Blosser said. The aim is to arrive at a habitat conservation plan, or HCP — basically a certification from federal agencies that says the plan is consistent with the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act and is good for both species recovery while allowing maximum timber harvests agreed to in the HCP, Blosser said.

The memorandum calls for the final plan to be developed so that legislation implementing the agreements will be enacted on or before the February 2022 Legislative session.

“This agreement proves that we can build a better future for Oregonians if we work together with a willingness to compromise,” Brown said. “Healthy forests and a vibrant forestry industry are not mutually exclusive.”

A collaborative process called Forests & Fish in Washington State led to a similar outcome, with over 60,000 stream miles and 9.3 million acres of Washington forests being protected by an HCP, according to Brown’s office.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Herbicides, Water

Governor Kate Brown Brokers Unprecedented Agreement Between Timber and Environmental Groups

February 10, 2020 By OFIC

By Governor Kate Brow’s Office | Feb 10, 2020

**This press release originally appeared on the Governor’s website. See that release here.

The memorandum of understanding will chart a new path for science-based forest management in Oregon

Salem, OR—Governor Kate Brown today announced a historic agreement between representatives from the state’s forest industry and major environmental groups to chart a collaborative course toward meaningful, science-based forest management in Oregon. The agreement takes a significant step toward a new era of cooperation, leaving behind the conflicts of the past.

“This pact proves that when we work together with a willingness to compromise, we can create a better future in Oregon,” said Governor Brown. “Oregonians want healthy forests and fish, a vibrant forest sector, and prosperous rural communities. These are not mutually exclusive goals. The conversations that brought forth this agreement, coupled with sound science, will bring certainty for everyone involved while protecting Oregon’s environment and endangered species.”

The signed memorandum of understanding (MOU) addresses three key issues. It will:

• Drive a process for Oregon to update its timber practices: For the first time, Oregon will strive for the endorsement of federal wildlife agencies, signifying that the state’s forest practices are protective of threatened and endangered species, including Oregon’s iconic salmon. Through this process, the state will seek a Habitat Conservation Plan, allowing Oregonians to continue their long tradition of working in the woods while honoring natural habitats.

• Support passage of new legislation for the 2020 session on aerial spraying of pesticides: A state-of-the-art system will build confidence with forest neighbors, who will be eligible to receive real-time notification that aerial spraying will occur. This first of its kind system will expand protected spray buffers around drinking water, homes, and schools.

• Expand forest stream buffers in the Rogue-Siskiyou region: New legislation will also expand forest stream buffers along salmon, steelhead, and bull trout streams, aligning forest practices in the area with those of the rest of western Oregon.
With this MOU, both sides have agreed that all forestry-related initiative petitions and related litigation will be dropped after the passage of the legislation this session.

“This MOU is shared recognition of the diverse benefits Oregon’s forests provide, and the need for more meaningful dialogue around forest issues across the state,” said Greg Miller, long-time timber industry executive and representative of the coalition of forest companies. “Oregon is one of the best places in the world to grow and harvest trees sustainably; we lead the nation in wood products manufacturing, and we are proud of our record of environmental stewardship.”

“Now as we move forward into a new era of cooperation and transparency, forest policy should continue to rely on the best available science,” said Miller. “The 60,000 Oregon families who work in the forest sector — indeed all Oregonians — expect that level of rigor and thoughtfulness when it comes to forest management. With this MOU, we are hopeful that we have found a pathway forward that meets those expectations and sets Oregon up for the most comprehensive, forward-thinking forest policy in the nation.”

“Today’s agreement is a critical step toward modernizing Oregon’s forest rules,” said Bob Van Dyk, Oregon policy director at the Wild Salmon Center. “Oregonians are rightfully proud of our forests and what they provide, including some of the best salmon runs in the Lower 48 and drinking water for most of the state. It’s our collective duty to make sure that a healthy timber industry doesn’t come at the expense of fish, wildlife, and public health.”

“This agreement is a genuine show of good faith from both sides,” said Van Dyk. “There’s still much work to be done for our communities and the healthy environment on which we all depend. There is a long road ahead, but this agreement is a big first step in the right direction.”

The complete MOU can be viewed here.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Herbicides, Water

PROFESSIONAL FORESTERS FILE INITIATIVES TO PROTECT PROVEN FORESTRY PRACTICES AND REDUCE WILDFIRE RISK

November 5, 2019 By OFIC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                 

Contact: Sara Duncan

Phone: 503-828-2373

Email: sarad@gallatin.com

 

PROFESSIONAL FORESTERS FILE INITIATIVES TO PROTECT PROVEN FORESTRY PRACTICES AND REDUCE WILDFIRE RISK

Three-Part Plan Safeguards Landowner Rights from Risky Anti-Forestry Management Proposals

[SALEM, November 5, 2019] – Professional foresters and forest landowners filed a package of citizen initiatives for the November 2020 General Election aimed at protecting the rights and proven forestry practices being put at-risk from radical anti-forestry ballot initiatives currently being pursued by environmental extremists.

 

“Oregon has some of the nation’s strongest environmental protections to ensure clean drinking water, require the replanting of millions of new trees and that keep our private forests and environment safe from catastrophic wildfires,” said Jim James, a chief petitioner of the three citizen initiatives and a Foster-based professional forester.

 

“But risky, radical proposals for the 2020 ballot would end proven forestry practices, preventing millions of new seedlings from growing into healthy forests and creating greater risks of dangerous fires that destroy our environment and pollute our air. We are committed to protecting what works and doing everything we can to defeat these risky, radical proposals.”

 

The initiatives filed today protect proven forestry practices and ensure the rights of forest landowners to responsibly manage their forests for both private and public benefit.

 

The Healthy Forests, Wildfire Reduction Plan includes:

 

  • The Oregon Forest Science Standards Act: Requires forest management be guided by peer-reviewed science;
  • The Forestry Oversight Improvement Act: Adds forestry experts to Oregon’s State Board of Forestry; and
  • The Fair and Just Compensation Act: Compensates property owners when government activities unfairly destroy or devalue their property.

 

According to statistics from the Oregon Department of Forestry, in the past 10 years, 80 percent of forest acres burned by uncontrolled wildfire in Oregon have occurred on neglected, unmanaged federal forests.  Although Oregon’s 2019 wildfire season remained relatively calm, over the past decade, more than 2.5 million acres of federal forestland has burned in Oregon, a direct result of years-long litigation over forest management on federal lands, even for health and disease purposes.

 

“Professional forestry is working on private forest lands in Oregon – for the environment, for people and for wildlife. When we protect the rights of Oregon forest landowners, we reduce the risk of catastrophic fires that destroy our environment and pollute our air. When we protect the rights of forest landowners, we ensure millions of newly replanted trees can grow and carbon pollution is pulled from the air,” said James.

 

 

###

 

Filed Under: News, Press Releases Tagged With: Fire

In Cap-and-Trade Considerations, Oregon Policy-Makers Should Include Reductions for Federal Forest Fire Smoke Carbon Emissions

August 21, 2018 By OFIC

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 21, 2018

Sara Duncan 503-586-1246

Oregon Forest & Industries Council

 

In Cap-and-Trade Considerations, Oregon Policy-Makers Should Include Reductions for Federal Forest Fire Smoke Carbon Emissions

 

On Wednesday, August 22, hundreds of policy-makers will gather in Lincoln City for the annual Oregon Coastal Caucus Economic Summit to discuss carbon cap-and-trade mechanisms and ways to reduce Oregon’s carbon footprint.

“Solutions to decrease unchecked wildfires and increase the production of sustainable wood products in our federal forests must be part of the dialogue of Oregon’s cap-and-trade program,” said Kristina McNitt, Oregon Forest & Industries Council President. “Rampant megafires in federal forests have catastrophic consequences for our safety, health, communities, and economy. Private forestland owners already contribute sizable solutions to climate change by managing forests for fire resiliency and sustainably producing renewable wood products that store carbon for the entire life of the product. Federal forests should do the same.”

Last summer, more than 7,600 people were evacuated from their homes. Oregonians suffered unhealthy air quality and emergency-room visits spiked. The cancellations of Oregon Shakespeare Festival performances, the Sisters Folk Festival, and Cycle Oregon cost our state millions in tourism dollars.

Of the more than 700,000 acres that burned in Oregon last fire season – roughly the size of Rhode Island – an equal number of fires started in federal and private forests, but about 96 percent of the acres burned were in federal forests. This summer, over 210,000 timbered acres have already burned – an area larger than Portland, Eugene and Seattle combined – and roughly 90 percent is in federal forests.  Since 2008, nearly 80 percent of burned acres in Oregon were in federal forests.

“There’s a better way to do this,” said Jim James, Executive Director for the Oregon Small Woodlands Association.  “Oregon policy-makers can do something to improve the health and economic vitality of all Oregonians, reduce forest fires, and mitigate climate change: take the position of the International Panel on Climate Change and encourage the use of Oregon-grown wood from federal forests.”

In 2007 and 2008, the International Panel on Climate Change concluded that in “the long term, a sustainable forest management strategy aimed at maintaining or increasing forest carbon stocks, while producing an annual sustained yield of timber, fiber or energy from the forest, will generate the largest sustained mitigation benefit.”

Of the roughly 30 million acres of forestland in Oregon, about 60 percent of it is federally-owned, and roughly 34 percent of it is privately owned (the remainder is tribal and state land). Conversely, 75 percent of Oregon’s timber harvest comes from that private forestland (and only 15 percent from federal land), making Oregon the number one producer of softwood lumber and plywood in the U.S.  Producing renewable, environmentally-friendly products helps the planet: trees literally use sunlight to capture carbon dioxide (a primary greenhouse gas) from the air and turn it into sustainable building products.

In 1971, Oregon pioneered forest regulations and today observes some of the strictest environmental protections in the nation, including mandatory reforestation after harvest. For every tree that is harvested in Oregon, four are planted in its place. Notably, reforestation after fire is not required, but nearly all private forests are rehabilitated after fire and replanted. Federal forests mostly remain charred.

“When our forests go up in flames, decades of carbon sequestration and storage goes with it,” said McNitt. “We can either breathe that carbon into our lungs as smoke, or we can store that carbon in renewable, sustainable wood products and plant trees to re-start that carbon cycle. We encourage our policy-makers to support wood products to meet Oregon’s climate goals.”

 

The Oregon Forest & Industries Council is a trade association representing more than 50 Oregon forestland owners and forest products manufacturers. Our members combine sustainable forest management practices with the latest science and technology to continuously improve the environmental, social and economic value of healthy working forests. We protect and manage more than 5 million acres of Oregon forestlands, employ nearly 60,000 Oregonians, and make Oregon the nation’s largest state producer of softwood and plywood. For more information, go to ofic.com.

The Oregon Small Woodlands Association is a member-based association that represents over 3000 small woodland owners in Oregon. For over 50 years OSWA has helped to serve needs unique to small woodland owners. OSWA focuses on fostering peer-to-peer communication between landowners, providing support for legislative and regulatory challenges, and cultivating partnerships to address and solve common problems. For more information, visit oswa.org.

Filed Under: Blog, News, Press Releases Tagged With: Fire

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Oregon Forests Forever

We all want to see Oregon thrive. When opposing sides work together, it helps solve some of the most pressing issues facing Oregonians today.

oregonforestsforever.com
  • About
    • Values
    • Members
  • News & Views
    • News
    • Press Releases
  • Forest Policy
    • Private Forest Accord
    • Carbon policy
    • Preserving Water Quality
    • Engineered Wood Products
    • Fire Suppression
    • Forestry Herbicides
    • Forest Taxation
  • Resources
    • Forest Facts
    • Private Forestland Closures
    • Links
  • Contact
  • Oregon Forest & Industries Council   |   © 2004-2025 All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Menu
  • Member Login
  • Home
  • About
    • Values
    • Members
    • Our Staff
  • News & Views
    • News
    • Press
    • Views
  • Forest Policy
    • Private Forest Accord
    • Preserving Water Quality
    • State Forests
    • Forestry Herbicides
    • Forest Taxation
    • Engineered Wood Products
    • Fire Suppression
    • Wildfire Funding
  • Resources
    • Private Forestland Closures
    • Forest Facts
    • Links
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Grounded in Science